Friar-Tuck:
Thanks for the photo and explanation.
I thought you got a new cage and reeds. These just pop in the V-3.
So anyone with a V3 could get these and install them.
I wish I had the Denaro to call the guy and order a set.
If only to show my appreciation for all the time/work you put into posting the results of your testing.
In my situation I would still have to buy a V-3, call for the non-part #'d (upgraded reeds) & and replace my current set up.
(remember it came with the bike undecided)

- Motorrads Jeff Wards Engine build round 2 9-99999.jpg (48.6 KiB) Viewed 7163 times
However!
If I was Building a bike Currently... Helloo Is anybody out there?! McFly!!!
Like the Guys Currently Putting bikes together with all the Cool Stuff...And already Have A V-3 ...
Quote
are having blow back/flutter issues in other High perf applications...I think what does Us in, is windowing the piston....
The key there is the "High performance application" part.
Running a Basically stock or mild build (pipe/air filter/windowed piston) the "non part#'d reed could be listed as a "Torque" or "Bottom End" application.
Let's say If you spend 90% of your time off Idle to 3/4 throttle.
I'm pretty sure that's why the Rad Valve works so well for my mostly single track, rarely even get into 5th gear application. The intake velocity is kept high enough to keep plunking along, but not so high as to get the reeds fluttering, and, as you stated (I think in an earlier post) the large "Secondary" part of the reed never even opens.
Heck,
I haven't even put my windowed piston in yet, so I may be all wet with the theory anyway!
Thanks again Rad, I have to admit seeing all the stuff going on in your shop makes me want to start tearing my bike apart again! grin
Standing by for the next development!
Tuck\o/
It took me so long to write my last post you got in another post....
My only concern with that is the air/fuel is gonna follow the path of least resistance, so although it may have a higher frequency than the rad valve, the smaller (V-3) would be made to work until the larger side would open.
I'm sayin is that just another way of running the boyesen theory. The multiple reed side is gonna take less effort to move,
at what point is the one side bouncing around and just messing up the signal for the larger side to work ?
This is your mission should you accept it... This message & My Head are gonna self destruct in 5 seconds...
Mission Impossible...
No... Mission Possible! grin